You reinserted information with bad references and redundant as it was explained in the paragraph below. I therefore will undo the article until the issue can be further discussed with other editors jlascar ( jlascar) -Jlascar 05:21, 3 October 2012 (UTC) Yes, with Jim1138. He has already been given two warnings for doing so. It is clear to me that Looper72 (whose main interest in Wikipedia seems to be to edit the Webshots article - I'd be surprised if there is not any personal interest beyond such edits) with a positive bias is trying to censor the article. Per discussion below? Discussing usually involves more than one person. Looper72 ( talk) 21:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC) -Preceding undated comment added 19:26, 9 March 2012 (UTC).
This update includes discussion of the toolbar and malware under the business model section as part of the history. The restored page was inaccurate and contained faulty references. Looper72 ( talk) 23:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Jlascar undid the edit above with no Talk discussion and a cursory glance. I think a way to go would be to restore the Aug 2011 portion of titles that breaks the history of the service into periods of different owners (which is an important component to its unique history) and then under American Greetings, "A number of Webshots users were unhappy when American Greetings chose to bundle their Kiwee Toolbar (which some sites list as malware) with the Webshots Desktop download." and then cite the blog post on Webshots with the complaints from users Looper72 ( talk) Per discussion below, editing the malware section for the page. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Agreed on not censoring. I think it would be OK to reduce the section size, but complete removal would be censorship. While Webshots currently does not supply malware, they once did. The rest of the entry has inaccurate information and inconsistent titling as well.
I hope that Jlascar is amenable to this compromise.
What if the Google article had large sections about malware that appeared in Google search or was presented in advertisement keywords all over Google? Just showing an extreme position to help make my point. This feels like a reasonable compromise, a NPV, and a balanced presentation for this article. To put this in context, I included a few sentences about the bundling under the business model section and authored a more detailed page for Kiwee Toolbar. Additionally the bundling occurred only during 2010. website, etc.) in addition to the Webshots Desktop software.
Webshots has been in existence since 1995 and has many components (e.g. I have been trying to strike a balance with Jlascar to preserve this information in the article on Webshots but to weight it accordingly. Kiwee Toolbar is known to be very difficult to uninstall and has been classified by some sites as Malware.
User Jlascar has had outstanding concerns about the period of time where the Webshots Desktop software included a bundle with the Kiwee Toolbar when both products were owned by American Greetings.